The Moral Theory Of Utility - 969 Words

Union buster Marty Leavitt does not operate under the concept of ethics of utility. The ethics of utility, also known as utilitarianism, focuses on maximizing net social welfare by creating the greatest good for the greatest number (of people). This concept differs greatly from the goals the union buster’s set out to achieve. The moral theory of Utilitarianisms, also known as free market, is the belief that maximizing aggregate welfare, in which the greatest benefits are produced with the lowest costs compared to alternative actions. (Labor, pg. 185) This belief differs from the union buster, because his goals is to ensure that a union never comes into existences, by any means necessary. A union buster, uses illegal tactics such as counter organizing drives, to prevent nonunion employees from joining a union. One such tactic is divide and conquer, as he targets not only the employees to get the results he wants, but also their immediate supervisors. The union buster is driven by self-interest and cares little if nothing about the greater good, nor for the employees’ of whom will benefit from union representation. One such union suppression tactics used by union busters, is the use of inefficient or welfare-reducing behavior, by compromising ethical and legal standards. The union buster resorts to lies and deceit as a mean of making sure that an organization does not unionize. The ethics of liberty focuses on employees and their individual freedom. Employees have aShow MoreRelatedJohn Stuart Mill : The Theory Of Morals, Utility, And The Greatest Happiness Principle1439 Words   |  6 PagesThe utility test stems from the Utilitarian Principle where the consequences of one’s actions determine right or wrong; the ends justify the means. Utilitarian ideas primarily came to fruition in the eighteenth century as three of the most prominent utilitarian philosophers released their works within the same timeframe, all principally speaking to the greatest happiness principle. John Stuart Mill, a distinguished British philosopher of utilitarianism, once stated, â€Å"The creed which accepts asRead MoreKant And John Stuart Mill s Utility Based, Utilitarian Moral Theory1551 Words   |  7 PagesOne of the most intriguing aspects of moral theory is not merely analyzing disagreements between renowned, intellectual giants, but examining the ways in which nea r polar ideologies can arise to similar conclusions based on vastly different rationales. Immanuel Kant s duty-based, deontological moral theory and John Stuart Mill s utility-based, utilitarian moral theory are prime examples of antithetical viewpoints that share similar outlooks to ethical subjects such as lying and helping those inRead MorePhilosophical Ethics Study Guide Essay1287 Words   |  6 Pagesdescription of what utility means vs. disutility). i. Act Unitarianism → States that the morally right act in any given situation is the act that would produce the greatest overall utility in its consequences to that person. ii. Utility → Desirable consequences which are said to have positive utility iii. Disutility → Undesirable consequences, often associated with pain and suffering, are said to have negative utility 3. What is the moral saints problem? Which moral theory does it object toRead MoreThe Differences Between Moral Motivation1390 Words   |  6 PagesThe differences between moral motivation in Groundworks and Utilitarianism Among the history of moral philosophy, two major philosophers, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill from the 18th and 19th century have come up with two different moral theories for the moral philosophy. Kant had established his view of moral in his bookâ€Å"The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of morals† and claimed that motivation of an actions are based on duty and reason. On the other hand, Mill’s idea is that actions baseRead More Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism Essay1363 Words   |  6 Pagesreflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way. (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings. This paper will attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kants theory provides a more plausible account of ethics. Immanuel Kants deonotological ethical theory assesses if actionsRead MoreNietzsche And Mill s Theory Of Morality Essay1505 Words   |  7 Pages Nietzsche and Mill have explored the theory of ‘morality’ from different perspectives. The two philosophers appear to get along that the notion ‘morality’ has been exploited to a great extent, though a little certainty has been provided on the issue. The two philosophers agree on the complexity of the issue. Mill’s theory of ethics is based on the concept of ‘utility. The philosopher provides the meaning of the idea as it has been largely perverted. Nietzsche stipulates that ‘morality’ is notRead MoreRelationship Between The Principle Of Utility And Moral Rules1462 Words   |  6 Pagesunderstanding of the relationship between the principle of utility and moral rules. In this essay I will argue that Mill thinks that there is a strong relationship between the two concepts, although he regards moral rules as having a subordinate relationship towards the principle of utility. Mill is a rule utilitarian who believes moral rules are useful guidelines for everyday uses, but reverts to the principle of utility in complex moral situations. In this essay I will also argue for the advantagesRead MoreExplain Bentham’s Utilitarianism: (30 Marks)843 Words   |  4 PagesExplain Bentham’s Utilitarianism: (30 Marks) A man called Jeremy Bentham had a theory called the ‘Utilitarianism theory’. He was born in London at the time of the great scientific and social change and wrote ‘The Principles of Morals and Legislation’ in 1789. Bentham had the theory that all humans seek pleasure and avoid pain at all costs. Utilitarianism has been described as an act or a rule rather than a theory. We break this down into three parts: -Motivation: Bentham was a hedonists (‘Hedone’Read MoreEthical Theories That We Have Taught Are Deontological Ethics And Utilitarianism1163 Words   |  5 Pages The two Contrasting ethical theories that we have studied are Deontological ethics and Utilitarianism. Deontological: Deon means obligation or duty; Logia means speech Whereas, Utilitarianism: means the greatest happiness of the greatest number †¢ Deontological ethical, according to deontologists certain actions are right or wrong in themselves and so there are absolute ethical standards that must be supported. The problems with this position are concerned with how we know which acts are wrongRead MoreJeremy Bentham And John Stuart Mills Mill On Utilitarianism872 Words   |  4 PagesMill on Utilitarianism â€Å"The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness (Utilitarianism, Mill). This theory of Utilitarianism was generated by the original Utilitarians, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Mill says: â€Å"Happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation